Application & system security

No. A review has defined scope and timing, and risks change as systems and usage evolve.

These are not included automatically. They require explicitly agreed scope, coverage and appropriate verified expertise.

Yes. Authorized systems and accounts, test types, timing and boundaries require clear approval from the responsible owner. Third-party systems need appropriate permission before inclusion.

Reports explain each issue, impact, priority and remediation with suitable technical evidence. Sharing and storage are agreed because security findings may contain sensitive details.

Retesting identified findings can be included, with timing, rounds and verification scope agreed. Closing a finding confirms the tested fix, not that the entire system is free of risk.

An authorized review scope, documented findings and priorities, practical recommendations and agreed rechecks. Deliverable details and acceptance criteria are agreed before work begins.

We assess scope, deliverables, integrations and existing systems and data. Estimates, delivery stages and external costs are clarified before implementation, with the impact of requested changes reviewed before approval.

We define handover, required training, support scope and duration, and responsibility for updates and operation. The agreement distinguishes in-scope work from new additions so your team knows what comes next.